Let's first say, I know I'm often responding here to questions or subjects raised on N's blog.
I appreciate his honesty, and willingness to declare out there in the blogosphere how he sees things, and explore, and even occasionally amend, his reasoning for those perspectives.
And, he gets me thinking.
His
Safer Sex posts have been interesting- as are the discussions that followed them. N.'s sexual practices, and his assessment (or rationalization) of the health risks of sexual contact with multiple new partners raised some hackles.
I generally agree with his perspective, primarily that oral sex without protection is
not prohibitively risky, not that it doesn't have risks. I will also say I am relieved that I am not driven to want or need many new partners- I'm glad the question of risk of STI (or pregnancy) isn't central to my thoughts these days... even if I am not entirely free of all risk.
And please use sound judgement for yourself, with all the attendant personal considerations well considered.
One of the last points he made, that people no longer feel at risk when they are in committed monogamous relationships, was not well received. But it seemed to me a "shoot the messenger" kind of reception.
Infidelity happens to other people, right? The thought that we may not be safe from all risk when we are home in our own beds with a committed partner is threatening, no?
Statistically,
30-60% of married individuals will engage in infidelity during the duration of their marriages. This number is probably conservative, and doesn't include the many nominally monogamous relationships between unmarried people. And all those adulterous partners? In theory they're out there fucking other people too...It evokes those old
Faberge Organics shampoo commercials (OMG it's Heather Locklear) you know, "she tells two friends, and she tells two friends, and so on and so on" and suddenly the screen is exponentially full of shiny-haired girls. I get visions of multiplying sex partners that creep me out just a little. Obviously we marrieds are not immune to risk.
While I know the definition of monogamy, in practice it is not always quite so perfect. I've been married for thirteen years. We've both had at least one other partner in that time, sometimes openly, other times not necessarily. Does this mean I'm no longer in a monogamous relationship?? Maybe... depending on the precision with which you use the word. Do we consider ourselves monogamous? At this point, yes. And truly, in spite of brief flirtations with the world of polyamory or whatever the fuck label I'd need to put on the
adventures I had with N, I feel like we've been pretty true to each other.
As far as I know, we were 100% monogamous for at least 14 years (we were together for a couple of years before we got married). But the longer I'm married, the older I get, the more compassion and understanding I feel for all of us.
Monogamy
looks more and more like an unnatural state- all across the spectrum of life- a fascinating discovery. Is it any wonder that in spite of our best efforts, we sometimes fail?
So, do my husband and I, in our monogamous relationship, practice unsafe sex? Hell yes.
Is it a risk, even a little one? Sure, but honestly, it's one I'm happy to take.